Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 8, 2017, at 11:39 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
> "Whenever a Player feels that e has been treated so egregiously by the
> Agoran community that e can no longer abide to be a part of it, e may
> submit a document to the
On Sat, 9 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
I looked through every MAY, there's no probs having it imply CAN in all
cases.
Hm looks like you're right. I guess the need for the opposite is so rare
it can just be written more explicitly.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Sat, 9 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
I already looked through these and posted a less elaborate list, although:
"A Reward is a specified amount of shinies associated with a Reward
Condition. For each time a player meets a Reward Condition, e MAY
claim the specified award exactly once within 24 ho
I'm fairly proud that my attempted Stamp thing served as the nudge to start
these dominos going.
But I'm not looking forwards to the work and reading that it will take to
get this all fixed though lol. It's like a silent cancer that has
maytastasized throughout our ruleset and just now we've notic
I looked through every MAY, there's no probs having it imply CAN in all cases.
On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> Yep. We definitely need to fix all of these. Just passing a "MAY
> (sometimes) implies CAN" rule would fix all in one stroke. However,
> the lower case ones aren't
Yep. We definitely need to fix all of these. Just passing a "MAY
(sometimes) implies CAN" rule would fix all in one stroke. However,
the lower case ones aren't problems at all, because "These definitions
are used when a rule includes a term in all caps, and provide guidance
in determining the ordin
so uh... agencies, rewards and welcome packages are illegal.
On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 1:39 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> "Whenever a Player feels that e has been treated so egregiously by the
> Agoran community that e can no longer abide to be a part of it, e may
> submit a document to the Registrar, clearl
7 matches
Mail list logo