On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> > "(i) Leapt before Lookt, awarded to those individuals who attempted to
>> > emulate First Speaker Michael Norrish by registering as soon as
>> > possible after hearing about Agora."
>> >
>> > Award the Patent Title of Not A Lurker to Yally, Mu
On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 10:15 -0700, Taral wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
> > Proposal: Very little or no lurk time (II=1, AI=1)
> > {
> > Amend rule 1922, Defined Regular Patent Titles, by adding a new bullet
> > to the end of the bulleted list reading:
> > "(i) Le
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
> Proposal: Very little or no lurk time (II=1, AI=1)
> {
> Amend rule 1922, Defined Regular Patent Titles, by adding a new bullet
> to the end of the bulleted list reading:
> "(i) Leapt before Lookt, awarded to those individuals who attempted
Fail
On 2009-06-07, Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Paul VanKoughnett
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Geoffrey Spear
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Paul VanKoughnett
>>>
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Kyle Marek-Spartz wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Geoffrey Spear
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Paul VanKoughnett
> wrote:
> >> I retract my proposal "Very little to no lurk time."
> >
> > Fails; no such proposal was ever in the Pool.
> >
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Paul VanKoughnett
> wrote:
>> I retract my proposal "Very little to no lurk time."
>
> Fails; no such proposal was ever in the Pool.
>
He meant "Very little or no lurk time" which was NttPF anyway.
Kyle Ma
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
> I retract my proposal "Very little to no lurk time."
Fails; no such proposal was ever in the Pool.
allispaul wrote:
> Please respond if you believe you deserve the Patent Title of Not A
> Lurker. I'll resubmit when I have a more complete list.
I'm pretty sure I registered as soon as I found Agora - and was
promptly saddled with CFJ 847, on which I defaulted. (CFJs 846-848,
and probably some
I deserve it I think, joined agora just after I found out about agora
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 4, 2009, at 12:38 AM, Paul VanKoughnett
wrote:
I retract my proposal "Very little to no lurk time."
Please respond if you believe you deserve the Patent Title of Not A
Lurker. I'll resubmit
Instant Gratification?
Leapt Before Lookt?
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
> > I retract my proposal "Very little to no lurk time."
> >
> > Please respond if you believe you deserve the Patent Title of Not A
> > Lurker. I'll resubmit when I have a mor
Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
> I retract my proposal "Very little to no lurk time."
>
> Please respond if you believe you deserve the Patent Title of Not A
> Lurker. I'll resubmit when I have a more complete list.
I think the patent title deserves a better name. Something creative.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
> I retract my proposal "Very little to no lurk time."
>
> Please respond if you believe you deserve the Patent Title of Not A Lurker.
> I'll resubmit when I have a more complete list.
Who has the longest lurk time? I have approx 3-4 years
Paul VanKoughnett wrote:
> I retract my proposal "Very little to no lurk time."
>
> Please respond if you believe you deserve the Patent Title of Not A
> Lurker. I'll resubmit when I have a more complete list.
I do I signed up, immediately registered, and jumped right in.
13 matches
Mail list logo
