On Fri, 22 May 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> However, one interesting point here is
> whether it's rule 106 or the proposal enacting the rules; it seems very
> clear that it's the proposal itself (especially because it's the
> proposal's power that matters to enact the rules), and interestingly,
> the
N.B. the ruleset has been ratified, but I'm not sure we haven't missed
knock-on effects to the gamestate. I think we still need a "R1482
never contained that text" ratification.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 22, 2009, at 5:21 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
These are only of academic interest now we'
2 matches
Mail list logo
