Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Judgements, CFJ 2954-2955

2011-01-10 Thread Jonathan Rouillard
I don't see how that statement is clearly TRUE. From R1789: The Player is deregistered as of the posting of the Writ, and the notation in the Registrar's Report will ensure that, henceforth, all may know said Player deregistered in a Writ of FAGE. Referencing you has a playe

DIS: Re: BUS: Judgements, CFJ 2954-2955

2011-01-10 Thread Jonathan Rouillard
Flipping the switch when it's already off, sure, but I figured you can't be deregistered if you're not a player. R869 states that "the verb "to be deregistered" means to cease to be a player (i.e., to have one's citizenship changed from Registered to Unregistered)". The Writ of FAGE didn't cause hi

DIS: Re: BUS: Judgements, CFJ 2954-2955

2011-01-09 Thread omd
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote: > In any case, omd did publish a Cantus Cygneys, but his deregistration > wasn't a Writ of FAGE but rather his own doing. I thus judge CFJ 2955 > FALSE. But the rules clearly say that the statement is TRUE, whether or not I actually dereg