On Mon, 12 Feb 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I find it funny how IRRELEVANT is a special case of DISMISS lol
>
> It's like: "This is bogus- but a SPECIAL kind of bogus!"
I was inspired to look at a history for this. TRUE and FALSE were
always there, but the rest of the scheme was:
1993 - UNDECI
I find it funny how IRRELEVANT is a special case of DISMISS lol
It's like: "This is bogus- but a SPECIAL kind of bogus!"
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 8:31 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> For something "out of play" IRRELEVANT might be best because distim and
> doshes
> aren't rules defined or describ
For something "out of play" IRRELEVANT might be best because distim and doshes
aren't rules defined or described, so don't have anything to do with earning
shinies, so whether someone distimmed eir doshes is irrelevant to the state of
shinies.
IRRELEVANT is also appropriate for your first asser
But yeah its a fuzzy line tbh. I can see your line of reasoning, it's like
one of those illusions where you can force your eye to make the ballerina
seem to rotate one way or the other.
I just wanted to mention that below lol because my head would feel
constipated otherwise and I think its a cool
To delve a bit further into it because I think its very interesting,
assuming that "Did he distim the doshes?" is judged DISMISS as I suspect it
would, what about "Did the distimming of the doshes per se make him earn a
Shiny?"
So basically, "He distimmed the doshes" => therefore => "he earned a
No it was meant as friendly discussion mainly!
I think the difference is semantic - If a thing is rules-described I tend
to think of "failed things" as still being some version of that thing, so
an "invalid bid" is still something that's there (as opposed to ooga boogas
that aren't there at al
Is this a Motion to Reconsider? I don't mind it if you deem it necessary.
(I personally don't think its too weird to consider "DISMISS" for a
statement like "Could a Ooga Booga have shinies?" or "Did he distim the
doshes?", which even if it can be read and seems to make language sense,
it's absurd
By saying there's insufficient information, you imply that you accept
the bid as POSSIBLE in the first place, because if the bid wasn't a
bid at all, the answer would be FALSE no matter what.
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> Statement: "were Gaelan’s bid of i on Quazie’s zombie auctio
8 matches
Mail list logo
