On 12/20/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Taral wrote:
> >Having received support of Zefram and root, I appeal Murphy's
> >judgement in CFJ 1840.
>
> This is not a complete tally of votes. You must include your own
> implicit vote. (See thread re CFJ 1831.)
I think that needs fixing. Impl
Ian Kelly wrote:
>By way of arguments, Telescope refers to CFJ 1361 and notes that for
>an action to be effective, there should be a clear indication of who
>is performing the action, which was not provided when WALRUS first
>attempted to register.
Murphy's judgement is based on the argument that
2 matches
Mail list logo
