DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement in R. v. Machiavelli, CFJ 3357

By the way, just so you know... I'm not considering this an official judgement, since it's unclear what the intended sentence is. Please be more clear. =P ~ Roujo On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Fool wrote: > > HER FELINE MAJESTY DAVY I > versus > TANNER SWETT (aka MACHIAVELLI) > > > > Char

DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement in R. v. Machiavelli, CFJ 3357

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Fool wrote: > On 09/07/2013 9:53 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: >> >> >> On Jul 9, 2013 9:50 PM, "Fool" > > wrote: >> > >> > >> > HER >> >> I intend, with two support, to appeal this judgment as I do not believe >> that there is conclusive evide

DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement in R. v. Machiavelli, CFJ 3357

The legal adequacy of this I will leave to actual players to determine; as a kibitzer I merely wished to note that it is an artistic triumph. Bravo, Fool! On 10 July 2013 11:50, Fool wrote: > > HER FELINE MAJESTY DAVY I > versus > TANNER SWETT (aka MACHIAVELLI) > > > > Charles Walker on beh

DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement in R. v. Machiavelli, CFJ 3357

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Fool wrote: > This judgement takes effect immediately. Long live the Queen. You have six more days. ;p

DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement in R. v. Machiavelli, CFJ 3357

Arguments on CFJ 3357: although it appears that this case may have been judged GUILTY, I can't figure out in any case what the sentence was. Additional arguments on CFJ 3357: since I did not possess any VCs on May 18, and I had no reasonable means of obtaining any in a timely fashion, it is not

DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement in R. v. Machiavelli, CFJ 3357

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Fool wrote: > I guess this is the Agoran version of "tits or GTFO"? > > Well I'm afraid this judg(e)ment cannot be appealed, check the rules. > Well I'm not sure that you made one at all, but that's because I stopped reading after "HER" -scshunt