Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement, CFJ 3164

2012-04-03 Thread omd
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > A non-player should not be under obligation to pay attention to any > forum. Adding penalties that require action (to avoid accumulating more > penalties) create this requirement for a non-player. I think I agree with you, but note that I did

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement, CFJ 3164

2012-04-02 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 2 Apr 2012, Tanner Swett wrote: > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:00 PM, ais523 wrote: > > Giving COMMUNITY SERVICE or APOLOGY would > > violate rule 101, as far as I can tell, due to harassing non-players. > > Rule 101 states that penalties shall not unduly harass a non-player > "if e wishes

DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement, CFJ 3164

2012-04-02 Thread Tanner Swett
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 5:00 PM, ais523 wrote: > Giving COMMUNITY SERVICE or APOLOGY would > violate rule 101, as far as I can tell, due to harassing non-players. Rule 101 states that penalties shall not unduly harass a non-player "if e wishes to ignore the game", so I think undue harassment must