Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement, CFJ 2941

2011-01-10 Thread Jonathan Rouillard
... I don't know how I missed this - I was pretty tired last night -, but yeah: R1769a) would be the way to go. Is there anything I can do now that I've judged this? =P On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:57 PM, omd wrote: > On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Jonathan Rouillard > wrote: >> I judge CFJ 2941

DIS: Re: BUS: Judgement, CFJ 2941

2011-01-09 Thread omd
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Jonathan Rouillard wrote: > I judge CFJ 2941 TRUE. Having read the relevant rules, I agree with G. > that R2282(b)  through R2282(d) are to be executed /after/ R2282(a), > so I also think they're "future events" as far as R1769 is concerned - > and thus, it happens