On Nov 4, 2016, at 1:47 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> * It’ll take me about that long to get the reports together anyways, and I’d
> rather not duplicate the effort if someone else is already doing it;
Apparently not.
I have DRAFTS of the two rules-required reports, as well as murphy’s “Bank
Sta
I didn't think to actually echo your intent. However, I am ready to
distribute the proposals after ribbons; if you'd like me to do so,
resign.
I had been planning to send a similar message. Happy to give the office
a shot if neither you nor aranea want it.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
wrote:
> If I haven't already voted on these, I vote PRESENT on all of them.
>
> (I sent a message to the list, but it was down so it told me that it
> would retry automatically. I have no idea if it actually did, so eh.
> =P)
It did.
Incidenta
Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On May 30, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>
>> Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> I intend to deputise for the Herald to announce that OscarMeyr became
>>> Speaker on 20 May 2009.
>> Oscar, or anyone deputizing if Oscar fails to do so: I believe the
>>
>
>
> Respectfully, my
On May 30, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend to deputise for the Herald to announce that OscarMeyr became
Speaker on 20 May 2009.
Oscar, or anyone deputizing if Oscar fails to do so: I believe the
Respectfully, my nickname is OscarMeyr, not Oscar. Take a go
On Sat, 30 May 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I intend to deputise for the Herald to announce that OscarMeyr became
> Speaker on 20 May 2009.
Oh sorry is that a duty now? Missed that. I'll announce it tomorrow
when I catch up with records. -G.
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>
>> at OscarMeyr became
>> > Speaker on 20 May 2009.
>
> Canada is a player, and an active one at that.
It is a person; I'm not aware of it ever becoming a player.
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> at OscarMeyr became
> > Speaker on 20 May 2009.
>
Canada is a player, and an active one at that.
Sean Hunt wrote:
> Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> I intend to deputise for the Herald to announce that OscarMeyr became
>> Speaker on 20 May 2009.
> Oscar, or anyone deputizing if Oscar fails to do so: I believe the
> current MWoPs are myself, ais523, root, yourself, and Wooble. Note that
> Canada being
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I intend to deputise for the Herald to announce that OscarMeyr became
> Speaker on 20 May 2009.
Oscar, or anyone deputizing if Oscar fails to do so: I believe the
current MWoPs are myself, ais523, root, yourself, and Wooble. Note that
Canada being awarded MWoP will not chang
Taral wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I accept this nomination. I also predict that Taral will decline (or
>> at least not accept) eirs, as IIRC e ran away screaming the last time
>> e was so nominated.
>
> Eh, if Murphy wants it, e can have it.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I accept this nomination. I also predict that Taral will decline (or
> at least not accept) eirs, as IIRC e ran away screaming the last time
> e was so nominated.
Eh, if Murphy wants it, e can have it. Murphy?
--
Taral <[E
On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 10:47 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I intend to deputise for the CotC to:
> > * Recuse the appeals panel on CFJ 2213a
> > * Recuse the appeals panel on CFJ 2203a
> > * Recuse the appeals pane
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend to deputise for the CotC to:
> * Recuse the appeals panel on CFJ 2213a
> * Recuse the appeals panel on CFJ 2203a
> * Recuse the appeals panel on CFJ 2172a
>
> I note that the CotC is very nearly overdue
On Saturday 22 December 2007 17:08:22 Zefram wrote:
> Josiah Worcester wrote:
> >I intend to deputise to publish the IADoP's report for last week. The time
> >limit has already expired.
>
> It's now a low-priority office, and so only has a monthly report.
>
> -zefram
>
Did *not* notice that.
On Sunday 25 November 2007 15:26:28 comex wrote:
> On Sunday 25 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> > Finally, if my above deputisation goes through, I intend to nominate
> > Murphy as CotC.
>
> You don't need to do that dependently.
>
>
I don't want the nomination to occur until I deputis
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> Finally, if my above deputisation goes through, I intend to nominate
> Murphy as CotC.
You don't need to do that dependently.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Sunday 25 November 2007 15:14:53 Ed Murphy wrote:
> pikhq wrote:
>
> > On Sunday 25 November 2007 13:32:11 comex wrote:
> >> On Sunday 25 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> >>> I intend to deputise for the CotC in the assignment of criminal case
> >>> 1804. The time limit for assignment r
pikhq wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007 13:32:11 comex wrote:
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
I intend to deputise for the CotC in the assignment of criminal case
1804. The time limit for assignment runs out in nearly 24 hours, so 48
hours after my declaration of intent, I
On Sunday 25 November 2007 13:32:11 comex wrote:
> On Sunday 25 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> > I intend to deputise for the CotC in the assignment of criminal case
> > 1804. The time limit for assignment runs out in nearly 24 hours, so 48
> > hours after my declaration of intent, I will
On Sunday 25 November 2007, Josiah Worcester wrote:
> I intend to deputise for the CotC in the assignment of criminal case
> 1804. The time limit for assignment runs out in nearly 24 hours, so 48
> hours after my declaration of intent, I will be allowed to deputise.
Hmm...
http://www.fysh.org/
"
On Saturday 17 November 2007 12:44:22 Ed Murphy wrote:
> Wed 14 Nov 03:56:30 Bake The Traitor created, contestmaster Murphy
> (contesthood disputed, treats comex differently
> from other potential contestants)
> Wed 14 Nov 11:29:49 Zefram joins Bake
On 10/31/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> comex wrote:
> > Actually, I'm not even sure if either of the deputisations will work. The
> > CotC isn't obligated to assign cases to me (just to someone), and
> > deputisation isn't clear on whether I can deputise with an argument (if
> > not t
comex wrote:
>I CFJ on the following:
A worthwhile CFJ from comex. With cogent arguments, even. Will wonders
never cease?
>While it seems that the CotC is indirectly required to perform that action
>(else he can't assign any judges, which he is required to do),
This is slightly wrong. The C
On 10/31/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > Yes, this set of deputisations definitely wouldn't work.
>
> Then, if Zefram wants to block the CFJs from being assigned, all he has to
> do is neglect to change sitting players to standing. The wors
comex wrote:
On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Taral wrote:
Well, I guess this works as well as the original attempt. However,
it's likely to hit you with 10,000 violations of Rule 1871.
I'm not sure about that. R1871 only says that the *CotC* SHALL NOT do
this. However, I think it's more like
On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Taral wrote:
> Well, I guess this works as well as the original attempt. However,
> it's likely to hit you with 10,000 violations of Rule 1871.
I'm not sure about that. R1871 only says that the *CotC* SHALL NOT do
this. However, I think it's more likely that it won
On 10/31/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I repeat the following sequence of actions 10,000 times:
> - I intend to deputise for the office of CotC for the purposes of changing
> all sitting players to standing.
> - I intend to deputise for the office of CotC for the purposes of assigning
> co
On 10/31/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I repeat the following sequence of actions 10,000 times:
> - I intend to deputise for the office of CotC for the purposes of changing
> all sitting players to standing.
> - I intend to deputise for the office of CotC for the purposes of assigning
> co
30 matches
Mail list logo
