Re: DIS: Re: BUS: If that's what you want, "pending" is pointless

2018-09-30 Thread Aris Merchant
Honestly, I'd probably be more open to it if we found an economy that everyone liked and then added it in later. I just don't like the feeling that the rules are intended to force people to do something they don't want to do. -Aris On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 11:11 PM Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > No, a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: If that's what you want, "pending" is pointless

2018-09-30 Thread Kerim Aydin
No, actually, while I was taking exception to your "always" statement, I'm cool to play with free proposals for a while. Just, y'know, not "always". I actually removed it that first sentence then initially then edited it back - I thought that if a promotor was required to distribute everything

DIS: Re: BUS: If that's what you want, "pending" is pointless

2018-09-30 Thread Aris Merchant
You probably just want to strike the first sentence. This would allow the Promotor to delay distributing a proposal and then remove it. I also haven't run a consistency check on this yet. I know this is partly (probably mostly) a manifestation of your frustration, but I actually agree with it. -A