On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:07 PM, James Beirne wrote:
> I change my posture to sitting.
It is how you do this. Welcome to the bench. =)
~ Roujo
omd wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:43 PM, omd wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:39 PM, ais523 wrote:
Yes. I don't want to give too much more information, though.
Maybe
(On second thought, I guess e's going to submit a Victory Announcement
after a judgement on this case has been unappeal
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Pavitra wrote:
> On 12/21/2011 06:32 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> > (Thanks to Bucky for discussing this with me.)
> >
> > CFJ (barring Bucky): With no changes to rule 2333, nor to other rules
> > that would change how rule 2333 is interpreted, if a contestmaster
> > announces th
On 12/21/2011 06:32 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> (Thanks to Bucky for discussing this with me.)
>
> CFJ (barring Bucky): With no changes to rule 2333, nor to other rules
> that would change how rule 2333 is interpreted, if a contestmaster
> announces that one or more persons "win the contest", and then
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 18:46 -0800, omd wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:43 PM, omd wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:39 PM, ais523
> > wrote:
> >> Yes. I don't want to give too much more information, though.
> >
> > Maybe
>
> (On second thought, I guess e's going to submit a Victory Announ
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:43 PM, omd wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:39 PM, ais523 wrote:
>> Yes. I don't want to give too much more information, though.
>
> Maybe
(On second thought, I guess e's going to submit a Victory Announcement
after a judgement on this case has been unappealed for a w
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 4:39 PM, ais523 wrote:
> Yes. I don't want to give too much more information, though.
Maybe this is one of those cases where first there's a CFJ on a simple
statement - the judge selects whichever interpretation looks most
reasonable at first glance - then a scam is pulled
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 16:36 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Alex Smith wrote:
> > (Thanks to Bucky for discussing this with me.)
> >
> > CFJ (barring Bucky): With no changes to rule 2333, nor to other rules
> > that would change how rule 2333 is interpreted,
>
> Just curious, sin
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Alex Smith wrote:
> (Thanks to Bucky for discussing this with me.)
>
> CFJ (barring Bucky): With no changes to rule 2333, nor to other rules
> that would change how rule 2333 is interpreted,
Just curious, since interpretations are of the ruleset at the time
the CFJ is cal
On 12 April 2011 03:23, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Try again?
This might take a while.
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Quazie wrote:
> If I am not a player I then I become a player when ehird wanted me to
> become a player.
No retroactive actions, so you CANNOT.
> If I am still not a player then If there exists a player of agora that
> was once known as Goethe and e wishes me to become a p
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:50 PM, omd wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Elliott Hird
> wrote:
>> On 12 April 2011 00:25, Quazie wrote:
>>> I'm a player if anyone wants me to be.
>>
>> I want you to be.
>>
>> CFJ: Quazie is a player.
>
> I vaguely remember something like this being done be
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> On 12 April 2011 00:25, Quazie wrote:
>> I'm a player if anyone wants me to be.
>
> I want you to be.
>
> CFJ: Quazie is a player.
I vaguely remember something like this being done before. Anyone
remember the details?
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Quazie wrote:
> I'm a player if anyone wants me to be.
State verbs are not action verbs.
Regardless, please rejoin! :)
-G.
I wrote:
> These were both to the PF. Discussion ends and voting begins at
> Wed 2 Jul 17:59:17 UTC. (Sorry, the later attempt to retract is
> unsuccessful.)
I still need one or more votes on whether to lynch Pavitra.
tusho wrote:
> 2008/6/30 Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Well I nominate Pavitra, as ZEFRAM tried to do it, and I think E is right.
>
> I support this nomination or whatever.
These were both to the PF. Discussion ends and voting begins at
Wed 2 Jul 17:59:17 UTC. (Sorry, the later attempt to ret
comex wrote:
>And I also nominate ZEFRAM, because coming out of the blue to nominate
>Pavrita is... a little suspicious.
Damn, rumbled. Yep, I'm a werewolf. In fact, I'm both werewolves.
Pavitra gave sufficient reason to suspect em of lupine tendencies.
-zefram
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:54 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I nominate comex for lynching.
>>
>> Why?
>>
>> E was the one who told me to nominate Wooble (after Wooble nominated em).
>>
>> E said that if I did, e'
2008/6/30 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hmph. So many accusations! But ehird has still not accepted my offer of
> chits!
>
> I nominate EHIRD.
>
> And I also nominate ZEFRAM, because coming out of the blue to nominate
> Pavrita is... a little suspicious.
>
Your arguments suck.
ehird
19 matches
Mail list logo
