On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 13:43, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6 Nov 2008, at 20:28, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
>> I resolve the above Bank Motion.
>>
>> APPROVE
>> BobTHJ (2234)
>> Taral (2224)
>>
>> DISAPPROVE
>> none
>>
>> I hereby remove the RBOA's rate for Coins.
>
>
> Umm... So much for
On 6 Nov 2008, at 20:28, Roger Hicks wrote:
I resolve the above Bank Motion.
APPROVE
BobTHJ (2234)
Taral (2224)
DISAPPROVE
none
I hereby remove the RBOA's rate for Coins.
Umm... So much for that email I sent you.
--
ehird
On 5 Nov 2008, at 21:28, Roger Hicks wrote:
Any chance you could special case either the RBOA transactions or the
non-RBOA transactions for past events? Constantly re-writing past game
history kind of sucks. Feel free to adopt whatever policy you wish
going forward...it's just the past items tha
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 14:07, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5 Nov 2008, at 20:47, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
>> Our reports were in agreement yesterday. Any chance you can remedy this?
>
>
> Either transfers do as much as possible, or fail if it's not exact.
>
> Due to the RBoA, I have now
On 5 Nov 2008, at 20:47, Roger Hicks wrote:
Our reports were in agreement yesterday. Any chance you can remedy
this?
Either transfers do as much as possible, or fail if it's not exact.
Due to the RBoA, I have now picked the former.
--
ehird
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 15:18, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4 Nov 2008, at 22:13, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
>> therefore the RBOA rules for transactions apply, not the PBAs
>
>
> That's a great way to cause mass confusion.
>
> So now I get to special-case the RBoA in my program...
>
Er...
On 4 Nov 2008, at 22:27, Roger Hicks wrote:
For simply the sake of relaxed recordkeeping on both our parts, I
initiate the following Bank Motion:
{
The RBOA's exchange rate for Coins is removed.
}
I can't but I in-spirit oppose. I don't mind the recordkeeping and I
think the
intra-Bank act
On 4 Nov 2008, at 22:13, Roger Hicks wrote:
therefore the RBOA rules for transactions apply, not the PBAs
That's a great way to cause mass confusion.
So now I get to special-case the RBoA in my program...
--
ehird
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 22:18 +, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 4 Nov 2008, at 22:13, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
> > therefore the RBOA rules for transactions apply, not the PBAs
>
>
> That's a great way to cause mass confusion.
>
> So now I get to special-case the RBoA in my program...
>
No, it's very
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 15:03, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4 Nov 2008, at 21:59, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>>
>>> (PBA) 2008-10-23 00:21 -- Murphy joins.
>>> 2008-10-23 00:21 -- Murphy deposits 7 6 crops for ^140. (originally
>>
>> tried to deposit 8, but only had 7 - ed, 2008-10-27)
>>
On 4 Nov 2008, at 21:59, Roger Hicks wrote:
(PBA) 2008-10-23 00:21 -- Murphy joins.
2008-10-23 00:21 -- Murphy deposits 7 6 crops for ^140. (originally
tried to deposit 8, but only had 7 - ed, 2008-10-27)
2008-10-23 00:21 -- Murphy transfers ^156 to RBoA. (fails, Murphy
only
has ^140)
(This
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 14:59, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4 Nov 2008, at 21:36, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
>> Ah..last time I reconciled that you didn't show it as failed.
>
> Which I apologize for - that was pre-automation. Geez, we sure are good at
> messing up
> our banks.
>
>> No
On 4 Nov 2008, at 21:36, Roger Hicks wrote:
Ah..last time I reconciled that you didn't show it as failed.
Which I apologize for - that was pre-automation. Geez, we sure are
good at messing up
our banks.
Now we have some serious problems because this screws up all the
rest of
Murphy'
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 14:36, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:02, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 4 Nov 2008, at 18:56, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>
>>> 2008-10-23 00:21 -- Murphy joins. Murphy deposits 7 6 crops for ^140.
>>> (originally tried to deposit
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:02, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4 Nov 2008, at 18:56, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
>> 2008-10-23 00:21 -- Murphy joins. Murphy deposits 7 6 crops for ^140.
>> (originally tried to deposit 8, but only had 7 - ed, 2008-10-27)
>> Murphy transfers ^156 to RBoA. (fails
On 4 Nov 2008, at 18:56, Roger Hicks wrote:
2008-10-23 00:21 -- Murphy joins. Murphy deposits 7 6 crops for ^140.
(originally tried to deposit 8, but only had 7 - ed, 2008-10-27)
Murphy transfers ^156 to RBoA. (fails, Murphy only has ^140)
538
Keyword "fails".
--
ehird
On 4 Nov 2008, at 18:56, Roger Hicks wrote:
It appears both ehird and I are incorrect on the RBOA's coin total.
if the log is right the count is right unless I have a major bug,
which I'm not sure
I do.
It's program-generated. But let me test.
--
ehird
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:56, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:05, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The reports definitely agree at this point, I checked myself. That should
>> save some calculation.
>
> Below is the data, first from the PBA report, and th
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:05, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reports definitely agree at this point, I checked myself. That should
> save some calculation.
Below is the data, first from the PBA report, and then from the RBOA
logs, which at this point are in agreement. It appears both
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 10:55 -0700, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:51, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4 Nov 2008, at 15:44, Roger Hicks wrote:
> >> FYI, after this transaction the RBoA had 0 coins.
> >
> > k
The reports definitely agree at this point, I checked myse
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:51, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4 Nov 2008, at 15:44, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>
>> 2008-10-20 19:33 -- ais523 attempts to withdraw 2 X crops for ^47.
>> (fails, it didn't - ed, 2008-10-21) ais523 transfers all of eir coins
>> (^719) to RBoA. (note - this hap
On 4 Nov 2008, at 15:44, Roger Hicks wrote:
2008-10-20 19:33 -- ais523 attempts to withdraw 2 X crops for ^47.
(fails, it didn't - ed, 2008-10-21) ais523 transfers all of eir coins
(^719) to RBoA. (note - this happened in splits throughout the run -
ed, 2008-10-21)
The total amount of coins ais
ehird, here's my previous message on the RBOA's coin holdings:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 13:47, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 24 Oct 2008, at 20:26, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
>> NOTE: After this withdraw I show the RBoA having 260 coins remaining.
>> The PBA would seem to have a different
On 27 Oct 2008, at 16:44, Roger Hicks wrote:
2008-10-20 19:39 -- RBoA transfers ^275 to root.
root clearly specifies in eir e-mail that e is withdrawing 250 coins.
> I believe I have 4337 chits. I withdraw 394 coins for 4334 chits; if
> I have fewer chits than 4334, then I withdraw as man
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:35, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 27 Oct 2008, at 16:31, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
>> The total amount of coins ais523 deposited during the Bank Run was 551,
>> not 719.
>
> Incorrect. That was how much I thought. My program says otherwise.
>
>> 2008-10-20 19:39
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 16:35 +, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 27 Oct 2008, at 16:31, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
> > The total amount of coins ais523 deposited during the Bank Run was
> > 551, not 719.
>
> Incorrect. That was how much I thought. My program says otherwise.
(snip)
> I imagine your count i
On 27 Oct 2008, at 16:31, Roger Hicks wrote:
The total amount of coins ais523 deposited during the Bank Run was
551, not 719.
Incorrect. That was how much I thought. My program says otherwise.
2008-10-20 19:39 -- RBoA transfers ^275 to root.
This was 250 coins, not 275.
Nope. Again, I th
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 13:47, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 24 Oct 2008, at 20:26, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
>> NOTE: After this withdraw I show the RBoA having 260 coins remaining.
>> The PBA would seem to have a different figure. What's the difference?
>
>
> I dunno. I don't have your
On 24 Oct 2008, at 20:26, Roger Hicks wrote:
NOTE: After this withdraw I show the RBoA having 260 coins remaining.
The PBA would seem to have a different figure. What's the difference?
I dunno. I don't have your recent change history; you have the PBA's.
Search for 'RBoA',
all the lines are
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 13:22, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:42, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I RBoA-withdraw as many coins as I can.
>>
> 218 coins for 1308 chits leaving you with 5 chits remaining.
>
> BobTHJ
>
NOTE: After this withdraw I show the
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:42, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I RBoA-withdraw as many coins as I can.
>
218 coins for 1308 chits leaving you with 5 chits remaining.
BobTHJ
On 24 Oct 2008, at 19:42, Ed Murphy wrote:
I RBoA-withdraw as many coins as I can.
BobTHJ?
--
ehird
32 matches
Mail list logo
