Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I deregister.

2010-12-11 Thread Ed Murphy
Wooble wrote: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:37 PM, ais523 wrote: >> On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 17:32 -0500, omd wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:25 PM, ais523 >>> wrote: Subject: Re: BUS: I deregister. >>> >>> CFJ: ais523 deregistered. >>> >>> (intentionally nttpf) >> >> The unedited Re: in t

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I deregister.

2010-12-11 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:37 PM, ais523 wrote: > On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 17:32 -0500, omd wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:25 PM, ais523 wrote: >> > Subject: Re: BUS: I deregister. >> >> CFJ: ais523 deregistered. >> >> (intentionally nttpf) > > The unedited Re: in the subject makes it pretty cle

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: I deregister.

2010-12-10 Thread ais523
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 17:32 -0500, omd wrote: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:25 PM, ais523 wrote: > > Subject: Re: BUS: I deregister. > > CFJ: ais523 deregistered. > > (intentionally nttpf) The unedited Re: in the subject makes it pretty clear that it wasn't intended to be an action. It's much lik

DIS: Re: BUS: I deregister.

2010-12-10 Thread omd
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 5:25 PM, ais523 wrote: > Subject: Re: BUS: I deregister. CFJ: ais523 deregistered. (intentionally nttpf)

DIS: Re: BUS: I deregister.

2010-11-21 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 19:20, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > I resign from all offices I hold, if not. I feel like everything you've done here has failed. The subject line deregistration is widely agreed to have failed, and the addition of the clause "if not" seems to undo your resignations due to ambi