On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 7:17 AM,
C-walker wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 8:16 PM, C-walker
> wrote:
>> I intend, without objection, to terminate this pledge.
>
> Having received no objections, I do so, although I am not sure this is
> within the time limit for intents.
14 days; you had almost ex
C-walker wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:15 PM,
> C-walker wrote:
>> {{ This is a Public Contract and a Pledge which has no name. Parties
>> to this Pledge SHALL NOT change their nicknames or names by which they
>> are referred to in a nomic except during the Birthday of that nomic.
>> }}
>
> I
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I treated "I change my nickname to X" as overriding "...who would
> like to be known as Y again" later in the same message, but on
> reflection, perhaps I shouldn't have. Ah well, that's what can
> happen when a thing isn't officially regulated.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> Yep, it's the "generally" that's confusing me here, as I can't figure
> out if it implies "there's an entity that 'e' generally refers to",
> which is false.
Well, it's certainly confusing even if it's not because e generally
referred to another
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
>> Also gains of most ribbons and some Notes would go to me.
>
> *sigh* see CFJ 1520, last two paragraphs of judge's arguments, please.
>
> -G.
I said /would/, not really thinking that the scam would work.
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 13:09 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
> >>> I change my name to "2.71828183..." or "e" for short.
> >>
> >> I'll accept 2.71828..., but don't
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
> Also gains of most ribbons and some Notes would go to me.
*sigh* see CFJ 1520, last two paragraphs of judge's arguments, please.
-G.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:05 PM,
> C-walker wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
>>> I change my name to "2.71828183..." or "e" for short.
>>
>> I'll accept 2.71828..., but don't you think picking the third-person
>> singular pronoun 'e' might
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:05 PM,
C-walker wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
> I change my name to "2.71828183...
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
>> > I change my name to "2.71828183..." or "e" for short.
>>
>> I'll accept 2.71828..., but don't you think picking the third-person
>> singular pronou
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Craig Daniel wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
I change my name to "2.71828183..." or "e" for short.
>
> No, because technically I believe e changed
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Craig Daniel wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
>>> > I change my name to "2.71828183..." or "e" for short.
>>>
>>> I'll accept 2.71828..., but
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
>> > I change my name to "2.71828183..." or "e" for short.
>>
>> I'll accept 2.71828..., but don't you think picking the third-person
>> singular pronou
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 12:42 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
> > I change my name to "2.71828183..." or "e" for short.
>
> I'll accept 2.71828..., but don't you think picking the third-person
> singular pronoun 'e' might have some *slight* chance of being "a name
>
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, C-walker wrote:
> I change my name to "2.71828183..." or "e" for short.
I'll accept 2.71828..., but don't you think picking the third-person
singular pronoun 'e' might have some *slight* chance of being "a name
that has generally been used to refer to another entity within t
16 matches
Mail list logo