On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That isn't a miswording, I sent the message but I had to send it from a
> different address, and it seems not to have arrived. H. Distributor Taral,
> can you check a-o to see if something got stuck there? Note that it's
On Wednesday 01 October 2008 12:53:00 pm Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Hold on here. Now we get to the point where a legitimate
> > communication is held up. Does this violate R101 participation
> > rights? -Goethe
>
> On the other hand, in a case
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm sorry, but _actions only happen when a majority of the list sees it_.
>>
>> See: comex's ratification scam from a while back.
>>
>> You're too late.
>
> Hold on here. Now we get to the point where a legitimate communicat
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 1 Oct 2008, at 17:07, Alexander Smith wrote:
>
>> That isn't a miswording, I sent the message but I had to send it from a
>> different address, and it seems not to have arrived. H. Distributor Taral,
>> can you check a-o to see if something got stuck
On 1 Oct 2008, at 17:07, Alexander Smith wrote:
That isn't a miswording, I sent the message but I had to send it
from a different address, and it seems not to have arrived. H.
Distributor Taral, can you check a-o to see if something got stuck
there? Note that it's worth 8VP to you, quite p
on doesn't arrive some time
the proposal didn't technically pass.
--
ais523
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of comex
Sent: Wed 01/10/2008 03:30
To: agora-discussion@agoranomic.org
Subject: Re: DIS: Re: BUS: How to win by bribery
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 a
On 1 Oct 2008, at 04:16, Ed Murphy wrote:
I need to check the exact details of Goethe's and BobTHJ's sell
tickets. I have the votes as 15F / 16A without those. Will take
care of it later tonight.
Haha. It is all for naught. ais523 was trying to continue eir
long-running streak of winning onc
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Proposal 5707 has been adopted, awarding a win to ais523. Therefore,
>> by rule 2188, ais523 satisfies the Winning Condition of Legislation.
>> Therefore, by rule 2186, as ais523 satisfies a Winning Condition but
>> no Losing Co
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Proposal 5707 has been adopted, awarding a win to ais523. Therefore,
> by rule 2188, ais523 satisfies the Winning Condition of Legislation.
> Therefore, by rule 2186, as ais523 satisfies a Winning Condition but
> no Losing Conditions, ais523 wins.
I need to check the ex
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:39 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Proposal 5707 has been adopted
> Not until the Assessor determines the option selected by Agora.
Uh... how silly, to miss a monthly win because you misworded a me
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:39 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proposal 5707 has been adopted
Not until the Assessor determines the option selected by Agora.
-root
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:39 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proposal 5707 has been adopted, awarding a win to ais523.
You owe me 8 VP. :P
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
12 matches
Mail list logo
