On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:41 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The proposal would actually subtly break lots of things, as the rules
> that govern proposals would be unable to give an AI 3.1 proposal an
> actual power of 3.1, due to only having a power of 3 themselves. As a
> result, rule 214
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 2:41 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There's very little practical difference betweet AI 3 and AI 3.1. If
>> we're willing to allow AI 3.1 proposals to modify any rule, why not
>> allow AI 3 proposals to do the same?
> The proposal would actually subtly break lots o
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 12:35 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:22 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 12:18 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, ehird wrote:
> >>
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:22 PM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 12:18 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, ehird wrote:
>> >> On 5 Oct 2008, at 14:41, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
>> >>> Tha
4 matches
Mail list logo
