On 10/1/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A better way to uphold viii.
> is to give every person the right to leave a binding agreement, or if
> you *really* want to preserve the spirit, make non-players ineligible
> to be parties to agreements, but again, that seems somewhat
> backwards...
I
On 9/30/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> root points out that this violates the spirit of Rule 101 (viii), but
> I believe it fails to violate the letter. I suggest amending Rules
> 101 and 1504 to clarify that the rules cannot directly impose
> obligations on non-players, but can genera
2 matches
Mail list logo
