Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Democracy

2019-10-22 Thread James Cook
On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 01:04, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote: > On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 00:59 +, James Cook wrote: > > I think it's pretty unclear. > > > > * Why should an attempt to do a players-only action indicate intent to > > become a player anyway? If I were to say "I deregister ATMunn" (m

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Democracy

2019-10-22 Thread ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 00:59 +, James Cook wrote: > I think it's pretty unclear. > > * Why should an attempt to do a players-only action indicate intent to > become a player anyway? If I were to say "I deregister ATMunn" (my > zombie), would you conclude that I intended, by publishing that > me

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Democracy

2019-10-22 Thread ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
On Tue, 2019-10-22 at 17:21 -0700, Gaelan Steele wrote: > I had no idea that it was supposed to be a registration attempt until > I saw others discussing it, so I think it’s a stretch to say it was > reasonably {clear, ambiguous}. I might actually buy an argument that it was unambiguous but unclea

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Democracy

2019-10-22 Thread Gaelan Steele
I had no idea that it was supposed to be a registration attempt until I saw others discussing it, so I think it’s a stretch to say it was reasonably {clear, ambiguous}. Gaelan > On Oct 22, 2019, at 5:14 PM, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 00:06 +, James Cook wrote

DIS: Re: BUS: Democracy

2019-10-22 Thread ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 00:06 +, James Cook wrote: > On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 00:02, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk > wrote: > > I also become a candidate. Election speech: Has anyone figured out > > whether or not I'm a player yet? > > > As Registrar, I'm assuming you aren't. > > My reasoning: Your a

DIS: Re: BUS: Democracy

2010-09-13 Thread omd
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Having also received support from Wooble, I make each of these > proposals (well, the decisions on whether to adopt them, which > should have been reasonably clear) democratic. (There is precedent that this is clear.)

DIS: Re: BUS: Democracy

2010-03-22 Thread Ed Murphy
ais523 wrote: > I support all three and do so, making sure to provide enough context in > the email headers that it should be clear what I'm talking about. Then I > CFJ on whether I did it or not. Gratuitous: The In-Reply-To: header of ais523's message matches the Message-ID: header of a message