On Monday 28 July 2008 03:14:11 pm I wrote:
> Resolving this probably will require a close reading of rule 2178.
> There would superficially appear to be a conflict in this case
> between its second-to-last and last paragraphs.
>
> For reference:
>
If the text of a potential contract is publ
On Monday 28 July 2008 03:06:35 pm Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2008/7/28 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Logged or not, your IRC channel isn't a Public Forum.
>
> And you don't have to agree to contracts in a Public Forum.
Resolving this probably will require a close reading of rule 2178.
There
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And you don't have to agree to contracts in a Public Forum.
Rule 2178:
Changes in the text or membership of a public contract do not
become effective until they are published.
The contract in question claimed t
2008/7/28 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Logged or not, your IRC channel isn't a Public Forum.
>
And you don't have to agree to contracts in a Public Forum.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No it wasn't.
>
> I can provide logs.
Logged or not, your IRC channel isn't a Public Forum.
2008/7/28 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Changes to the parties in a public contract take effect when they're
> published; eir leaving the contract was published before you joined
> it.
>
No it wasn't.
I can provide logs.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:50 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Too late; I've already agreed to it on IRC.
Changes to the parties in a public contract take effect when they're
published; eir leaving the contract was published before you joined
it.
7 matches
Mail list logo
