On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Pavitra wrote:
> Alex Smith wrote:
>> (Compare the recent message by G., where G. stated that e
>> intended to register without actually intending to register, and it
>> was ruled ineffective because the intent didn't actually exist in
>> G.'s mind.)
Gratuitous: I disagree
Alex Smith wrote:
> --- On Tue, 22/9/09, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> From: Kerim Aydin Subject: DIS: Re: BUS:
>> Darth Cliche reregisters To: "Agora Discussion"
>> Date: Tuesday, 22 September,
>> 2009, 10:20 PM
>>
>> On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Kenner G
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Alex Smith
wrote:
> Arguments: "I register" does not necessarily indicate intent to register, on
> the basis that the person in question might have been lying. (Compare the
> recent message by G., where G. stated that e intended to register without
> actually i
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I was gunning for MALFORMED.
>
> -coppro
I don't think MALFORMED is ever an appropriate judgement. If the
statement is malformed, the case can't be initiated.
--
-c.
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
I CFJ (II=0) "I is a player."
TRUE; you is. Even if your variations in grammar are truly awful.
I was gunning for MALFORMED.
-coppro
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I CFJ (II=0) "I is a player."
TRUE; you is. Even if your variations in grammar are truly awful.
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Kenner Gordon wrote:
> I register.
I... er... my goodness. I don't think I can CFJ anything on that one.
7 matches
Mail list logo
