Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Crufty McCruft

2009-03-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote: > On 2009-03-01, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >> On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote: >>> And our ruleset is gigantic anyway. >> >> March 2009 >>> Current total number of rules: 133 >> >> November 2002 >>> There are currently 309 Rules > > The galaxy is giganti

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Crufty McCruft

2009-03-01 Thread Elliott Hird
On 2009-03-01, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote: >> And our ruleset is gigantic anyway. > > March 2009 >> Current total number of rules: 133 > > November 2002 >> There are currently 309 Rules > > -Goethe. > > > > The galaxy is gigantic. The universe is giganticer. The

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Crufty McCruft

2009-03-01 Thread Warrigal
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote: >> And our ruleset is gigantic anyway. > > March 2009 >> Current total number of rules: 133 > > November 2002 >> There are currently 309 Rules > > -Goethe. Proto: Promote all power-1 rules to the power 1.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Crufty McCruft

2009-03-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Elliott Hird wrote: > And our ruleset is gigantic anyway. March 2009 > Current total number of rules: 133 November 2002 > There are currently 309 Rules -Goethe.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Crufty McCruft

2009-03-01 Thread Elliott Hird
2009/3/1 Ed Murphy : > ehird wrote: > >> Proposal: Nobody's using them, so might as well de-cruft (AI: 3, II: 1) > > Bit early to declare that, innit?  They've only existed for slightly > over a month now. > > They've been used exactly 0 times. And mentioned about thrice. And our ruleset is gigan

DIS: Re: BUS: Crufty McCruft

2009-03-01 Thread Ed Murphy
ehird wrote: > Proposal: Nobody's using them, so might as well de-cruft (AI: 3, II: 1) Bit early to declare that, innit? They've only existed for slightly over a month now.