ais523 wrote:
> comex was inactive at the start of the week.
At the start of the week, the active parties were me, coppro,
Tiger, and ehird - correct?
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Hang on, Rule 2233 is based on the number of parties that are
> active players, not contestants; thus, the Cookie Jar's limit
> was indeed 20, and the 6-point award worked (and the 1-point
> award failed).
Oops, my bad. This would explain why
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 11:13 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I wrote:
>
> > root wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >>> I award 6 more y-points to Tiger for guessing the exact number of
> >>> judicial cases for April 6-12.
> >> This exceeds the Cookie Jar's weekly allo
I wrote:
> root wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> I award 6 more y-points to Tiger for guessing the exact number of
>>> judicial cases for April 6-12.
>> This exceeds the Cookie Jar's weekly allowance of y-points by 5. Do
>> we have a precedent for whether this
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I award 6 more y-points to Tiger for guessing the exact number of
> judicial cases for April 6-12.
This exceeds the Cookie Jar's weekly allowance of y-points by 5. Do
we have a precedent for whether this resulted in awarding 1 y-point,
or fail
5 matches
Mail list logo
