On 01/09/2010 03:34 PM, comex wrote:
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
That's more an argument for further limiting awards based on the number
of guesses submitted. On the other hand, contests in general may have
run their course for a while; the FRC is getting plenty of non-Ag
ais523 wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 06:22 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> ais523 wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 16:36 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote:
Guesses for Dec 28 - Jan 3: None, even with the deadline
extended to Jan 6 due to the holiday. For completeness, the
actual totals were 0
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:28, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> * 8 y-points to Wooble
>>> * 6 y-points to c-walker
>>> * 4 y-points to BobTHJ
>>> * 2 y-points to Wooble
>>
>> Is this in compliance with the Cookie Jar agreement? I thought prizes
>>
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> * 8 y-points to Wooble
>> * 6 y-points to c-walker
>> * 4 y-points to BobTHJ
>> * 2 y-points to Wooble
>
> Is this in compliance with the Cookie Jar agreement? I thought prizes
> only paid to 3rd place? Why 4th place for CFJs but not propos
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 01:40, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I award:
>
> * 8 x-points to c-walker
> * 6 x-points to Wooble
> * 4 x-points to coppro
>
> * 8 y-points to Wooble
> * 6 y-points to c-walker
> * 4 y-points to BobTHJ
> * 2 y-points to Wooble
Is this in compliance with the Cookie Jar agreemen
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Invalid, guesses must now be in by the end of Friday (UTC).
Bah, what idiot made that change?
Oh. Right.
Wooble wrote:
> I guess 6 proposals, 9 CFJs
Invalid, guesses must now be in by the end of Friday (UTC).
Benjamin Caplan wrote:
> I leave the Cookie Jar.
I can't let you do that, Dave.
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> 4) The distribution of a proposal is a point-worthy event (counting
> at most 5 proposals per author per week) for the X axis.
Considering we can know right before the week starts how many I must
legally distribute, it's surprising that people gu
c-walker wrote:
> I guess 8 CFJs for the next week for which I haven't already guessed.
NttPF.
> Murphy, does the proposal guessing system work by the number submitted
> or the number distributed?
4) The distribution of a proposal is a point-worthy event (counting
at most 5 proposals per author
Murphy wrote:
> Guesses for June 22-28 Proposals CFJs
> ---
> Tue 16 Jun 16:35:58 c. 15 15
> Sun 21 Jun 08:50:09 c-walker 16 9
> Sun 21 Jun 08:54:13 Yally 8 12
> * 4 x-points to c-walker
>
> * 8
Ed Murphy wrote:
> Guesses for June 15-21 Proposals CFJs
I intend, without objection from any party to The Cookie Jar, to amend
The Cookie Jar by adding a paragraph:
6) Any party to this contract CAN leave it by announcement.
Pavitra wrote:
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>> I guess 7 proposals and 13 CFJs for next week.
> 5 proposals, 10 CFJs.
This was ttPF but you already guessed on June 2.
2009/6/7 Ed Murphy :
> Tiger wrote:
>
>> I reatract my previous guesses and guess 11 proposals and 9 CFJs.
>
> The contract doesn't recognize retraction. Feel free to propose
> changing that; it would change the dynamic somewhat.
>
I'll think about it. For now I'll just be happy with my original g
Tiger wrote:
> I reatract my previous guesses and guess 11 proposals and 9 CFJs.
The contract doesn't recognize retraction. Feel free to propose
changing that; it would change the dynamic somewhat.
Tiger wrote:
> If I haven't already guessed, I guess 10 proposals, 19 CFJs
NttPF and you also already guessed on June 2.
Yally wrote:
> I guess 10 proposals and 10 CFJs.
And you guessed already on June 2, anyway.
Yally wrote:
> I guess 10 proposals and 10 CFJs.
NttPF
2009/6/7 Benjamin Caplan :
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>> I guess 7 proposals and 13 CFJs for next week.
> 5 proposals, 10 CFJs.
>
> Pavitra
>
If I haven't already guessed, I guess 10 proposals, 19 CFJs
--
-Tiger
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 12:42, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > Guesses for May 25-31 Proposals CFJs
> > ---
> > Tue 19 May 13:21:18 BobTHJ20 17
> > Tue 19 May 14:01:03 Quazie23
ehird wrote:
> This is ridiculously easy money.
Only if your guess is one of the closest. The more contestants, the
larger the prize, but the less likely (assuming all guesses are equally
likely to be accurate) that any given player will get it.
This is ridiculously easy money.
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 22:08, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Guesses for May 11 - 17 Proposals CFJs
>> ---
>> Mon 4 May 11:41:49 BobTHJ 18 14
>> Mon 4 May 11:58:26 Tiger 10
Ed Murphy wrote:
> Guesses for May 4 - 10 Proposals CFJs
> ---
> Wed 29 Apr 00:53:57 Quazie10 10
> Sun 3 May 22:12:06 Tiger 14 11
> Sun 3 May 22:16:38 coppro29 21
> Sun 3 May 22:21:53 Wooble
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> There are four active contestants (comex, coppro, ehird, Tiger), so I
> can award up to 20 points per week and revoke up to 8 per week.
comex was not active at the beginning of the week, so e doesn't count.
-root
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Week of March 23-29:
> 1 proposal (6167)
> 8 CFJs (2429-36)
>
> Guesses:
> Mon 16 Mar 15:01:17 comex -- 0
> Mon 16 Mar 15:05:46 Tiger -- 0
> Mon 16 Mar 22:46:48 OscarMeyr 9 6 (non-contestant)
> M
26 matches
Mail list logo
