On 10/1/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about: make kopeks zero-sum.
Then kopeks can't be a currency. But that might not be so bad.
-root
How about: make kopeks zero-sum. Kopeks represent credits and debts, not
absolute wealth. You can transfer kopeks away from yourself as long as
your kopek total stays above some negative limit (your credit limit) which
depends (probably linearly) on the number of VCs you have. Members with
a neg
On 10/1/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Suppose the following system instead: Whenever a new member joins for
> the first time, e receives credit for the VCs e had at that time.
> Whenever a former member joins, e receives credit for the credit e had
> when e left, adjusted for any VC g
On 9/24/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 5) Each kopeck has exactly one color. Each color of kopeck is a
> currency. Ownership of kopecks is restricted to members. The
> Bankor is the recordkeepor of kopecks.
>
> 6) As soon as possible after a member requests credit, the Bankor
Ed Murphy wrote:
6) As soon as possible after a member requests credit, the Bankor
SHALL create in eir possession, for each color of VC in eir
possession, minimum(100*X-Y,0) kopecks of that color, where X is
the number of VCs of that color in eir possession, and Y is the
number of ko
5 matches
Mail list logo
