On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 09:58 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> I see what you're doing with the indirection here (attempting to
>> empower R1728 at power 3), but you haven't convinced me yet. The
>> indirection doesn't remove the impossible nature of the task.
>>
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 09:58 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I see what you're doing with the indirection here (attempting to
> empower R1728 at power 3), but you haven't convinced me yet. The
> indirection doesn't remove the impossible nature of the task.
> Take a close look at R2140:
> No entit
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, comex wrote:
> I cause Rule 2238 to amend itself to read:
>
> ais523 CAN cause this rule to amend itself by announcement.
>
> comex CAN, with support, cause Rule 1728 to amend Rule 2141.
>
> comex CAN, with support, cause Rule 1728 to change the power of
> t
3 matches
Mail list logo
