comex wrote:
On 8/29/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
comex wrote:
But it is still a quote.
Quotation is an aspect of its construction, yes. That doesn't exempt
it from R2149.
I CFJ, barring Zefram, on the statement:
A part of a message sent to a Public Forum that is quoting another
m
comex wrote:
>But it is still a quote.
Quotation is an aspect of its construction, yes. That doesn't exempt
it from R2149.
-zefram
On 8/29/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A "TTttPF" means that the main body is not a "mere quote". It
> incorporates the quoted text into the primary context of the message,
> where it is very much relevant to R2149.
But it is still a quote.
Peekee wrote:
>count as a false statement but still perform the action?
Difficult to say. It's not clear to me whether that actually performs
the action, since the truth value of the whole is independent of whether
the voting part is true or not.
I'm inclined to say that a statement that takes a
comex wrote:
>actually makes it relatively easy (unfortunately) for a knave to
>perform game actions anyway, or otherwise publish true statements.
>For example, a TTttPF is generally accepted as performing actions even
>though the main body of the message is a quote, and therefore
>irrelevant to Ru
Would
{{
I vote as follows...
and
1 + 1 = 3
}}
count as a false statement but still perform the action?
Quoting comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 8/29/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Prohibiting a player from posting true
statements thus denies em the right to take many game actions, whi
On 8/29/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Prohibiting a player from posting true
> statements thus denies em the right to take many game actions, which is
> a major aspect of participation in the public forum.
Gratuitous arguments:
The last paragraph of 2149:
Merely quoting a statement
7 matches
Mail list logo
