It also invalidates Trigon's vote. When I was writing the CFJ, I read
the vote as being ambiguous about how changes to the other people's
votes would affect the caster's vote, but now reading it, I am finding
it unambiguous, so I would be happy to motion to reconsider, if others
are also confused.
Ok I found ATMunn's attempt to re-vote, so what I'm not sure of is how
this applies to Trigon's vote which is below. Basically I don't get
the logic of CFJ 3647 on how/why ATMunn's vote could be "conditional"
because it seems pretty unconditional to me - so I can't see how the
logic chain extra
As assessor, this judgement leaves me woefully confused as it does
not appear to be any kind of conditional vote and I'm not going
to go digging for the cited discussion. Does this invalidate just
ATMunn's vote, or ATMunn's and Trigon's, or what? (I know Corona's
is settled in a different CFJ)
3 matches
Mail list logo
