DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 1933

2008-05-23 Thread Ed Murphy
ehird wrote: > I judge this contract for CFJ 1933, which I join: > {This contract is a pledge. Parties to this contract may not judge CFJ > 1933 by anything other than this contract.} CFJ 1933 is an inquiry case, so this judgement is invalid.

DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 1933

2008-05-22 Thread comex
On 5/22/08, Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I judge this contract for CFJ 1933, which I join: > {This contract is a pledge. Parties to this contract may not judge CFJ > 1933 by anything other than this contract.} I don't think contracts are valid judgements for inquiry cases.