Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ: popes

2010-09-09 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > I hereby certify that I bear a physical copy of this card, and did so at > > the time and prior to the time of the proposal being adopted: > > http://www.principiadiscordia.com/downloads/pope_card

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ: popes

2010-09-09 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > I hereby certify that I bear a physical copy of this card, and did so at > the time and prior to the time of the proposal being adopted: > http://www.principiadiscordia.com/downloads/pope_card.pdf > part of whose text, placed as it is in R101,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ: popes

2010-09-09 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
On 9 September 2010 16:20, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn > wrote: >> Gratuitous arguments (even though I would very much like to be a pope): >> The fact that the 5th position in our "major arcana" is called the >> Crown Prince goes against the idea that i

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ: popes

2010-09-09 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > Gratuitous arguments (even though I would very much like to be a pope): > The fact that the 5th position in our "major arcana" is called the > Crown Prince goes against the idea that it should represent the pope. > In no culture that I'm awa

DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ: popes

2010-09-09 Thread Jonatan Kilhamn
On 9 September 2010 15:31, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > I CFJ on {{Tiger is a pope.}} > > Arguments: "pope" is not defined by the rules, and is not primarily > used in a mathematical or legal context, so we need to determine the > ordinary language definition in use in the rule created by P6832. > > Co