Re: DIS: Re: BUS: At least 1 CFJ, maybe 3.

2008-07-18 Thread Quazie
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quazie wrote: > >> So, did CFJ 1 and CFJ 2 in this message actually end up as CFJs? > > I left the message in my pending-judicial folder, and will process > them later depending on the outcome on #3. > > I'm nearly certain #1

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: At least 1 CFJ, maybe 3.

2008-07-18 Thread Ed Murphy
Quazie wrote: > So, did CFJ 1 and CFJ 2 in this message actually end up as CFJs? I left the message in my pending-judicial folder, and will process them later depending on the outcome on #3.

DIS: Re: BUS: At least 1 CFJ, maybe 3.

2008-07-18 Thread Quazie
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 12:36 AM, Quazie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1 maybe > On behalf of Human Point Two I do the following { Human Point Two CFJs > on the following statement: "This is a CFJ" } > > Arguments - by Human Point Two - "By R101 I have the right to submit a > CFJ which is