Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Antivirus 2009

2009-03-16 Thread Alex Smith
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 13:06 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > ais523 wrote: > > > I'm very disappointed that you didn't find a way to escalate that to > > power 3. What a waste of a good scam! > > I could have added "rules with lower Power take precedence over rules > with higher Power", but then you wou

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Antivirus 2009

2009-03-16 Thread Ed Murphy
ais523 wrote: > I'm very disappointed that you didn't find a way to escalate that to > power 3. What a waste of a good scam! I could have added "rules with lower Power take precedence over rules with higher Power", but then you would have hit me.

DIS: Re: BUS: Antivirus 2009

2009-03-16 Thread Alex Smith
On Sun, 2009-03-15 at 16:21 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > ais...@normish.org wrote: > > > As permitted by the rule created by proposal 6130, I cause > > Rule 2223 (Win by Junta) to amend itself to change its text > > to "Any non-player partnership whose basis contains no other > > members but ais523,

DIS: Re: BUS: Antivirus 2009

2009-03-15 Thread Elliott Hird
2009/3/15 : > As permitted by the rule created by proposal 6130, I cause > Rule 2223 (Win by Junta) to amend itself to change its text > to "Any non-player partnership whose basis contains no other > members but ais523, comex, Goethe, or coppro (but need not > necessarily contain all those members