On 25 Nov 2008, at 23:09, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
Dang. What's the use of that limitation?
Disqualifying everyone but a partner in crime?
On Nov 25, 2008, at 2:02 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
OscarMeyr wrote:
I CFJ on the following inquiry statement, barring ehird, comex, and
Pet A:
You can only disqualify one person these days. I'm treating this as
disqualifying ehird, and failing to disqualify comex or Pet A.
Dang. What's the
OscarMeyr wrote:
> I CFJ on the following inquiry statement, barring ehird, comex, and
> Pet A:
You can only disqualify one person these days. I'm treating this as
disqualifying ehird, and failing to disqualify comex or Pet A.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Would you cut it out with trying to EXILE Warrigal all the time for
>> obvious sarcasm/jokes?
>
> As soon as e stops sending obvious sarcasm to
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you cut it out with trying to EXILE Warrigal all the time for
> obvious sarcasm/jokes?
As soon as e stops sending obvious sarcasm to the PF as purported Game Actions.
On 23 Nov 2008, at 19:20, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
I intend, with 2 support, to initiate a criminal CFJ, alleging
Warrigal violated R2215 in the above-quoted message. I recommend
EXILE.
Would you cut it out with trying to EXILE Warrigal all the time for
obvious sarcasm/jokes?
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Canids 1 through 100 register. Context: Canids 1 through 100 are
>> canids I saw once. They all asked me to act on their behalf to
>> register. There
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Canids 1 through 100 register. Context: Canids 1 through 100 are
> canids I saw once. They all asked me to act on their behalf to
> register. Therefore, I can.
I intend, with 2 support, to initiate a criminal CFJ, alleging
War
On 23 Nov 2008, at 15:55, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
The message from ehird was not posted by Pet A, but by ehird. It
seems to me that Pet A (or indeed any person) would have to post
directly from eir own email address to validly register.
Act on behalf doesn't work! YAY GAMESTATE RECALCULATI
9 matches
Mail list logo
