Re: DIS: Re: BUS: An Apologetic Proposal

2009-08-18 Thread comex
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> Of course, I wouldn't be surprised if any given current set of Senators >> voted to give themselves permanent power; I would. I doubt there are many old players who would want to suddenly come in an

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: An Apologetic Proposal

2009-08-18 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Of course, I wouldn't be surprised if any given current set of Senators > voted to give themselves permanent power; Oh, er, and this would likely violate every Senator's R101(vii) right. Although that particular right is in drastic need of a lengthening/

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: An Apologetic Proposal

2009-08-18 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Pavitra wrote: > comex wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: >>> Problem: Former players retain their senatorship and thus become >>> voters in an emergency session. >> >> Nope, because Senator is redefined as a subset of first-class >> players... but

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: An Apologetic Proposal

2009-08-18 Thread Pavitra
comex wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: >> Problem: Former players retain their senatorship and thus become >> voters in an emergency session. > > Nope, because Senator is redefined as a subset of first-class > players... but I think this would actually be a good thing,

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: An Apologetic Proposal

2009-08-17 Thread C-walker
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:43 PM, comex wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: >> Problem: Former players retain their senatorship and thus become >> voters in an emergency session. > > Nope, because Senator is redefined as a subset of first-class > players... but I think this

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: An Apologetic Proposal

2009-08-17 Thread comex
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Roger Hicks wrote: > Problem: Former players retain their senatorship and thus become > voters in an emergency session. Nope, because Senator is redefined as a subset of first-class players... but I think this would actually be a good thing, though there might be

DIS: Re: BUS: An Apologetic Proposal

2009-08-17 Thread comex
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:03 AM, C-walker wrote: > An Apologetic Proposal (AI = 2, II = 2) > Amend Rule 1950 by replacing its entire text with: Oh, and this needs AI 3. -- -c.

DIS: Re: BUS: An Apologetic Proposal

2009-08-17 Thread comex
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:03 AM, C-walker wrote: > I submit the following proposal and play Distrib-u-matic to make it > Distributable. > > {{ > > An Apologetic Proposal (AI = 2, II = 2) > > [[ This proposal turns Senatorship into a switch, clarifies dependent > actions with only specific types of

DIS: Re: BUS: An Apologetic Proposal

2009-08-17 Thread Roger Hicks
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 09:03, C-walker wrote: > I submit the following proposal and play Distrib-u-matic to make it > Distributable. > > {{ > > An Apologetic Proposal (AI = 2, II = 2) > > [[ This proposal turns Senatorship into a switch, clarifies dependent > actions with only specific types of pl