On Sat, 12 Sep 2009, Charles Walker wrote:
> I've just realised that dependant actions are still broken. Thanks for
> the withdrawal anyway.
You know, I haven't followed all the ins and outs of the arguments, but
I really don't thing dependent actions have to be judged broken.
Consider:
Origina
G. wrote:
> You know, I haven't followed all the ins and outs of the arguments, but
> I really don't thing dependent actions have to be judged broken.
>
> Consider:
>
> Originally, the rule relied on a single list-based linguistic convention
> to decide whether the A, B, and C were logically 'A
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> 2009/9/12 Charles Walker :
>> I don't see how this is a valid objection. Agora should be open to
>> diplomatic relations with heathen nomics as well as the more refined
>> ones.
>
> Well, true, I guess it is Neutral vs Friendly.
>
> I retract
Charles Walker wrote:
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
2009/9/12 Charles Walker :
I intend, without objection, to flip the Recognition of #nomirc on
Freenode to Neutral.
I object; from what I hear its players are a little incompetent at IRC.
I don't see how this is a val
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> 2009/9/12 Charles Walker :
>> I intend, without objection, to flip the Recognition of #nomirc on
>> Freenode to Neutral.
>
> I object; from what I hear its players are a little incompetent at IRC.
I don't see how this is a valid objection. Ag
5 matches
Mail list logo
