On Monday 13 October 2008 01:01:44 pm comex wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > R2136 used to include the requirement that a contest be "fair to
> > all contestants" in order to be a contest
>
> Among the problems with that was that a contest which ce
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ben Caplan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't Without 3 Objections, in effect, a pragmatic requirement to be
> fair?
Yes, that was the reasoning behind the current mechanism.
-root
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> R2136 used to include the requirement that a contest be "fair to all
> contestants" in order to be a contest
Among the problems with that was that a contest which ceased to be
fair automatically ceased to be a contest, perhaps
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:14 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Three players create a contract that allows any of its parties to flip
>> its contestmaster by announcement. They take turns as contestmaster from
>> week to w
On Monday 13 October 2008 12:27:27 pm Taral wrote:
> Isn't it a rule that anyone can join a contest and that contest
> must award points "fairly"?
I don't think so. There might be a proposal coming up to that effect.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:14 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Three players create a contract that allows any of its parties to flip
> its contestmaster by announcement. They take turns as contestmaster from
> week to week: player A awards 15 points to player B, then flips the
> contestmast
On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 12:05 -0500, Ben Caplan wrote:
> I retract that proposal, and submit the following AI=1, II=1,
> entitled "Creative contest switching v.2":
This is an incredibly bad idea. Goethe deregistered over root's equity
contest scam (which I was involved in); this would make the scam
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 12:04 -0500, Ben Caplan wrote:
> On Monday 13 October 2008 11:50:00 am ais523 wrote:
> > On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 12:05 -0500, Ben Caplan wrote:
> > > I retract that proposal, and submit the following AI=1, II=1,
> > > entitled "Creative contest switching v.2":
> >
> > This is an
On Monday 13 October 2008 11:50:00 am ais523 wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 12:05 -0500, Ben Caplan wrote:
> > I retract that proposal, and submit the following AI=1, II=1,
> > entitled "Creative contest switching v.2":
>
> This is an incredibly bad idea. Goethe deregistered over root's
> equity co
Pavitra wrote:
> I submit a proposal, AI=1, II=1, "Creative contest switching":
> {
> Amend rule 2136 (Contests) by replacing the text:
>
> Any player CAN flip the contestmaster of a public contract
> without 3 objections, except if doing so would cause a player to
> be contestm
10 matches
Mail list logo
