Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Allow severity adjustments

2009-02-21 Thread Alex Smith
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 13:43 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > Er, was mean to imply rounding to integer *after* setting the > > multiplication level to any real between 1/2 and 2 and multiplying, so > > a default Class 10 crime could be any integer between 5 an

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Allow severity adjustments

2009-02-20 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, Kerim Aydin wrote: > Er, was mean to imply rounding to integer *after* setting the > multiplication level to any real between 1/2 and 2 and multiplying, so > a default Class 10 crime could be any integer between 5 and 20. Hmm, > also not sure that a geometric range is desired

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Allow severity adjustments

2009-02-20 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, comex wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >>The judge CAN, with 2 Support, set the fine at a >>different integral level between one half and double that >>amount, > > Aren't 1 and 2 times the only such integral levels?

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Allow severity adjustments

2009-02-20 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:15 PM, comex wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >>The judge CAN, with 2 Support, set the fine at a >>different integral level between one half and double that >>amount, > > Aren't 1 and 2 times the only such integ

DIS: Re: BUS: Allow severity adjustments

2009-02-20 Thread comex
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >The judge CAN, with 2 Support, set the fine at a >different integral level between one half and double that >amount, Aren't 1 and 2 times the only such integral levels?