Re: DIS: Re: BUS: A question

2008-11-07 Thread Warrigal
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7 Nov 2008, at 21:58, Warrigal wrote: > >> Well, that was fun. > > > Oh great, you're back to making completely useless contracts. But the Notary doesn't have to track this one. --Warrigal of Escher

DIS: Re: BUS: A question

2008-11-07 Thread Elliott Hird
On 7 Nov 2008, at 21:58, Warrigal wrote: Well, that was fun. Oh great, you're back to making completely useless contracts. -- ehird

DIS: Re: BUS: A question

2008-11-07 Thread Ian Kelly
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree to the following: {This is a pledge. This is a public > contract. Warrigal CAN terminate this contract by announcement. > Warrigal SHALL NOT announce that he is not wearing a hat; if e does, > then as punishment, e SHALL