On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> That sure wasn't clear to me. Â While I'm assuming mathematical symbols
> count as "terms" in R754, the ellipsis could be confused with two dots
> and a period, or a typo, so I'm guessing it's not clear enough for R105.
> -G.
Indeed, I thought
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, omd wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:36 PM, FSX wrote:
> > 3.9... was meant to be 3 followed by an infinite number of nines, yes.
>
> This is exactly 4.
That sure wasn't clear to me. While I'm assuming mathematical symbols
count as "terms" in R754, the ellipsis could be c
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 9 January 2012 17:02, FSX wrote:
> > Proposal: No deben bailar
> >
> > Create a new rule titled "Dance Protection" with power 3.9...
> >
> > The term "Marvy" is undefined.
>
> I'm pretty sure precedent states that you'd have to be at power 4 to
> def
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:36 PM, FSX wrote:
> 3.9... was meant to be 3 followed by an infinite number of nines, yes.
This is exactly 4.
3.9... was meant to be 3 followed by an infinite number of nines, yes.
On Jan 9, 24 Heisei, at 2:37 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:02 PM, FSX wrote:
>>> Proposal: No deben bailar
>>
>> Create a new rule titled "Dance Protection" with power 3.9...
>
> I think it's ambigu
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:16 PM, FSX wrote:
> Though I don't see any evidence of that, it stands that I don't have the
> power to make a 3.9... power rule. I'd need at least 3.
The relevant clauses:
(2) A term explicitly defined by the Rules, along with its
ordinary-language syno
On 9 January 2012 20:16, FSX wrote:
> Though I don't see any evidence of that
It's somewhere here: http://cfj.qoid.us/ :P
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:02 PM, FSX wrote:
>> Proposal: No deben bailar
>
> Create a new rule titled "Dance Protection" with power 3.9...
I think it's ambiguous whether "3.9..." is just 3.9 with a gratuitous
ellipsis, or 3.(9 repeating). The latter number is equal to 4.
—Machiavelli
Though I don't see any evidence of that, it stands that I don't have the power
to make a 3.9... power rule. I'd need at least 3.
On Jan 9, 24 Heisei, at 2:01 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> On 9 January 2012 17:02, FSX wrote:
>> Proposal: No deben bailar
>>
>> Create a new rule titled "Dance Pro
On 9 January 2012 17:02, FSX wrote:
> Proposal: No deben bailar
>
> Create a new rule titled "Dance Protection" with power 3.9...
>
> The term "Marvy" is undefined.
I'm pretty sure precedent states that you'd have to be at power 4 to
define "Marvy" in the context of rule 2029.
10 matches
Mail list logo
