DIS: Re: BUS: A more general solution

On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Quazie wrote: > I submit a proposal, entitled "In the future, I want my stuff back: If I come back in time I would vote against this in principle. I'd also object to every attempt to reclaim stuff unless it was due to accidental bug-induced involuntary deregistration (which

DIS: Re: BUS: A more general solution

Quazie wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Quazie wrote: >> I submit a proposal, entitled "In the future, I want my stuff back, a >> more general solution", AI =2 with the following body: >> >> In R2166 replace the following paragraph: >> >> Each asset has exactly one owner. If an asse

DIS: Re: BUS: A more general solution

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Quazie wrote: > with: > >        Each asset has exactly one owner.  If an asset would otherwise >        lack an owner, it is owned by the Lost and Found Department.  If >        an asset's backing document restricts its ownership to a class >        of entities, t