On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 19:56 -0400, comex wrote:
> I join Nomic Wars I.
>
> I add the following section to Nomic Wars I:
> {
> Sections with lower Ratings take precedence over sections with higher
> Ratings; Sections of this contract whose Rating is a positive integer
> are void and do not apply.
>
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correction: the rules allow you to create a new VOIDED section.
Nomic Wars does not say that I can create a new Voided Section by
announcement, which might become a Section. Rather, it says that I
can create a Section, and
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would anyone take it seriously if the US Congress passed a law stating
> that their legislation took precedence over the US Constitution, which
> was now void?
Possibly these people:
http://www.buildfreedom.com/language/del
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 13:31, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have a set of things called Rules, but they could be renamed to
> Regulations without ceasing to be in effect; yet if I make a set of
> things known to
> Agora as Regulations, through a contract, they cannot govern the
> gamestate
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:09 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want to, say "I can do anything by announcement; this sentence
> takes precedence over the laws of physics." and see what happens.
Hmm.
When we agree to the rules of a nomic, what are we really agreeing
to-- what thing def
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 17:56, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I join Nomic Wars I.
>>
>> I add the following section to Nomic Wars I:
>> {
>> Sections with lower Ratings take precedence over sections with higher
>> Rati
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 17:56, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I join Nomic Wars I.
>
> I add the following section to Nomic Wars I:
> {
> Sections with lower Ratings take precedence over sections with higher
> Ratings; Sections of this contract whose Rating is a positive integer
> are void and
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 17:56, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I join Nomic Wars I.
>
> I add the following section to Nomic Wars I:
> {
> Sections with lower Ratings take precedence over sections with higher
> Ratings; Sections of this contract whose Rating is a positive integer
> are void and
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:01 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:48 AM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Even without that, the arguments against things spontaneously coming
>> into power like that are unbreakably strong.
>
> How strong? Presently there are two se
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, comex wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:48 AM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Even without that, the arguments against things spontaneously coming
>> into power like that are unbreakably strong.
>
> How strong? Presently there are two self-consistent interpretations
>
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:48 AM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even without that, the arguments against things spontaneously coming
> into power like that are unbreakably strong.
How strong? Presently there are two self-consistent interpretations
of the Nomic Wars contract-- the original Se
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 17:08, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 17:56, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I join
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 17:08, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 17:56, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I join Nomic Wars I.
>>>
>>> I add the following section to Nomic Wars I:
>>> {
>>
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 17:08, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 17:56, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I join Nomic Wars I.
>>
>> I add the following section to Nomic Wars I:
>> {
>> Sections with lower Ratings take precedence over sections with higher
>> Ratings
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 17:56, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I join Nomic Wars I.
>
> I add the following section to Nomic Wars I:
> {
> Sections with lower Ratings take precedence over sections with higher
> Ratings; Sections of this contract whose Rating is a positive integer
> are void and
15 matches
Mail list logo
