Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Ribbon Auctions

2017-12-23 Thread Edward Murphy
(Still skimming through a-d messages from my walkabout period, still have 20 Nov through 30 Nov left.) ATMunn wrote: >> I'm also uncomfortable with having the Ribbon rule mention Shinies; >> it's intended to work long-term even if the ruleset changes beneath >> it. I wouldn't know how to do th

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Ribbon Auctions

2017-11-18 Thread Corona
I don't think Black would necessarily be a "scam ribbon". One could obtain the Black Ribbon by a completely honest proposal - they would just have to incentivize other players to vote for it. True, the "incentive" may take the form of money, but also endorsements on other votes etc. I'm for keeping

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Ribbon Auctions

2017-11-17 Thread ATMunn
I wouldn't know how to do this without mentioning Shinies. I'm alright if this doesn't pass; it's my first real controversial proposal, and I feel that having proposals fail here and there is no less a part of Agora, or any Nomic, than having them pass. On 11/17/2017 8:44 PM, Alex Smith wrote:

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Ribbon Auctions

2017-11-17 Thread Alex Smith
On Fri, 2017-11-17 at 20:40 -0500, ATMunn wrote: > Here's an idea I was originally going to include in the Auctions > proposal, but it might be more controversial so I decided to > make it as a separate proposal. > > I submit the below proposal and pend it with AP: Arguably this should replace Bl

DIS: Re: BUS: [Proposal] Ribbon Auctions

2017-11-17 Thread ATMunn
Oops, I was going to include a conditional so it doesn't do anything if the Auctions proposal didn't pass, but I think people will be sensible enough to not vote for this if they don't vote for that. On 11/17/2017 8:40 PM, ATMunn wrote: Here's an idea I was originally going to include in the Auc