No, you don't. That only applies to Docket #1.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:14 PM Rebecca wrote:
>
> this is patently invalid. forgot everything had to include evidence.
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Rebecca wrote:
>
> > Your honour, I submit the following argument to d0ket two:
> > This cou
I don't believe that this fulfills the spelling tule as the incorrect
spelling falls outside of the body of the argument, as precedent for
defining the body of the argument, I present the way that they have
been shown in the updates.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:14 PM Rebecca wrote:
>
> Your honour,
this is patently invalid. forgot everything had to include evidence.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Rebecca wrote:
> Your honour, I submit the following argument to d0ket two:
> This court should rule that the purpose of a nomic is to develop into a
> perfect game, and nomics therefore should
(though I encourage Counsellors to respond to invalid arguments that are
interesting
as this one is, as they will be part of the record even if they cannot make any
limitations) Also on this one: More respect for the Most Heroic Suber as per
#6.
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> W
While this public submission to the court is greatly appreciated, entering the
contest was closed 2 days ago, so the Hon. CuddleBeam can no longer become a
contestant. Close reading of the tournament regulations implies this is an
automatically-INVALID rule (as opposed to being "not a rule").
5 matches
Mail list logo
