Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Arbitor] CFJ 3971 assigned to Secretsnail9

2022-07-07 Thread secretsnail9 via agora-discussion
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 11:07 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 7/8/22 00:03, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 10:37 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion < > > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > >> On 7/7/22

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Arbitor] CFJ 3971 assigned to Secretsnail9

2022-07-07 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
On 7/8/22 00:03, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote: > On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 10:37 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion < > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > >> On 7/7/22 19:58, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote: >>> As it has no mentions of the rules, I didn't think it was necess

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Arbitor] CFJ 3971 assigned to Secretsnail9

2022-07-07 Thread secretsnail9 via agora-discussion
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 10:37 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 7/7/22 19:58, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote: > > As it has no mentions of the rules, I didn't think it was necessary to > > include an interpretation where a tabled action must

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Arbitor] CFJ 3971 assigned to Secretsnail9

2022-07-07 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
On 7/7/22 19:58, secretsnail9 via agora-discussion wrote: > As it has no mentions of the rules, I didn't think it was necessary to > include an interpretation where a tabled action must be rules-defined as an > action able to be performed with one of those methods. But looking at Rule > 2125 (Regul

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [Arbitor] CFJ 3971 assigned to Secretsnail9

2022-07-07 Thread secretsnail9 via agora-discussion
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 5:56 PM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 7/7/22 01:03, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote: > > That is, fulfilling these requirements in order to take the action by > announcement IS performing the action "with support", makin

DIS: Re: BUS: [Arbitor] CFJ 3971 assigned to Secretsnail9

2022-07-07 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
On 7/7/22 01:03, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote: > That is, fulfilling these requirements in order to take the action by > announcement IS performing the action "with support", making it a tabled > action. The same applies to all tabled action methods. > So what's left to answer is if ais5

DIS: Re: BUS: [Arbitor] CFJ 3971 assigned to Secretsnail9

2022-06-29 Thread secretsnail9 via agora-discussion
> > In the past, contract-defined dependent/tabled actions have been read to > implicitly function as closely to the rules as possible (treating them > as jargon), but the rules have never before been held to authorize > contract-defined actions as dependent actions themselves, so the game > cus