Of course, defining "bad form" in nomic is a minefield, and a blanket
ban would be a bad idea when part of the game is exploring these
limits. But what about a rule prohibiting clear, unambiguous and
severe breaches of good form, with clear malign intent? Or a rule
with specific prohibitions (e.
Yeah, I struggled a lot with this. I decided 21 in the end after comparing
other sentences of TIME OUT. 7-14 days seems typical for repeated neglect
of duties and this seemed a bit more extreme to me.
On 2013-08-07 9:57 PM, "Craig Daniel" wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Tanner Swett wro
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Tanner Swett wrote:
> Oh, and further arguments: I think that the "please treat Agora right good
> forever" clause is vague enough that it should not be punishable in cases of
> negligence, but only in cases of actual malice.
>
> —Machiavelli
I opine that a small
For the record, I support an appeal.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On 7 August 2013 20:18, omd wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:28 AM, James Beirne
> wrote:
> >> Judgement: GUILTY/TIME OUT (21 days)
> >
> > I intend to appeal this judgement with two support, as I d
Oh, and further arguments: I think that the "please treat Agora right good
forever" clause is vague enough that it should not be punishable in cases of
negligence, but only in cases of actual malice.
—Machiavelli
5 matches
Mail list logo