Tanner L. Swett wrote:
> For multiple reasons, this may not work, but...
>
> I intend to have Arkady English create the following promise and
> transfer it to me: "Text: I perform the action specified by the
> cashier. Conditions for non-destruction: 0 = 0."
>
> Now, suppose I intend for my neph
On 11 August 2011 05:16, Pavitra wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 09:35 AM, Arkady English wrote:
>> (Note: I believe this means I create 21 copies, and transfer one to
>> each of these players:
>>
>> Wooble
>> Benu
>> ais523
>> BobTHJ
>> Droowl
>> ehird
>> Flameshadowxeroshin
>> G.
>> Gondolier
>> Math321
On 11 August 2011 06:04, Pavitra wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 11:52 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 21:41, Pavitra wrote:
>>> On 08/10/2011 11:24 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
I destroy my copy of this Promise.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure this actually works. I vaguely remember an attempt to fix
>
On 08/10/2011 11:52 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 21:41, Pavitra wrote:
>> On 08/10/2011 11:24 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> I destroy my copy of this Promise.
>>
>> I'm not sure this actually works. I vaguely remember an attempt to fix
>> this problem with legislation, which I think p
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 21:41, Pavitra wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 11:24 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> I destroy my copy of this Promise.
>
> I'm not sure this actually works. I vaguely remember an attempt to fix
> this problem with legislation, which I think passed, but...
>
> R2166 (power 2):
> An ass
On 08/10/2011 11:24 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I destroy my copy of this Promise.
I'm not sure this actually works. I vaguely remember an attempt to fix
this problem with legislation, which I think passed, but...
R2166 (power 2):
An asset generally CAN be destroyed by its owner by
announc
On 08/10/2011 11:29 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 23:25 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
>> On 08/10/2011 11:23 PM, ais523 wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 23:16 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
H. Registrar, can you confirm this?
>>>
>>> More interestingly, what happens if the list's wrong?
>>
>> The l
Long custom (arguably contradicted by long precedent) is that it can.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 11, 2011, at 12:29 AM, ais523 wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 23:25 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
>> On 08/10/2011 11:23 PM, ais523 wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 23:16 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
H. Regist
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 23:25 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 11:23 PM, ais523 wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 23:16 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
> >> H. Registrar, can you confirm this?
> >
> > More interestingly, what happens if the list's wrong?
>
> The list was only flavor text. If the given li
On 08/10/2011 11:23 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 23:16 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
>> H. Registrar, can you confirm this?
>
> More interestingly, what happens if the list's wrong?
The list was only flavor text. If the given list is wrong, then it
actually platonically happened according to
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 23:16 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
> H. Registrar, can you confirm this?
More interestingly, what happens if the list's wrong?
--
ais523
On 08/09/2011 09:35 AM, Arkady English wrote:
> (Note: I believe this means I create 21 copies, and transfer one to
> each of these players:
>
> Wooble
> Benu
> ais523
> BobTHJ
> Droowl
> ehird
> Flameshadowxeroshin
> G.
> Gondolier
> Math321
> Murphy
> omd
> Pavitra
> Roujo
> scshunt
> Tanner L.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 08:11, Pavitra wrote:
> *rereads*
>
> Right, I'm with you again now.
>
> Okay, I agree that it's cashable. But there's a catastrophic bug in it
> that I think I'd rather exploit than explain.
I'd love to exploit it too, except I think the promise is effectively unusable.
W
On 9 August 2011 16:11, Pavitra wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 10:03 AM, Arkady English wrote:
>> On 9 August 2011 15:54, Pavitra wrote:
>>> On 08/09/2011 09:50 AM, Pavitra wrote:
On 08/09/2011 09:35 AM, Arkady English wrote:
> I create a number of copies of the following promise equal to one le
On 08/09/2011 10:03 AM, Arkady English wrote:
> Also, how easy is it to correct the
> typo of the missing "If"?
Right, forgot to answer this. There's no mechanism for amending
promises. You'd have to issue a new set of promises, and maybe try to
get the old ones destroyed.
On 08/09/2011 10:03 AM, Arkady English wrote:
> On 9 August 2011 15:54, Pavitra wrote:
>> On 08/09/2011 09:50 AM, Pavitra wrote:
>>> On 08/09/2011 09:35 AM, Arkady English wrote:
I create a number of copies of the following promise equal to one less
the number of First-Class players of A
On 9 August 2011 15:54, Pavitra wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 09:50 AM, Pavitra wrote:
>> On 08/09/2011 09:35 AM, Arkady English wrote:
>>> I create a number of copies of the following promise equal to one less
>>> the number of First-Class players of Agora:
>>>
>>> Conditions: The casher, on cashing thi
On 9 August 2011 15:50, Pavitra wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 09:35 AM, Arkady English wrote:
>> I create a number of copies of the following promise equal to one less
>> the number of First-Class players of Agora:
>>
>> Conditions: The casher, on cashing this promise, creates a promise
>> text: { If I h
On 08/09/2011 09:50 AM, Pavitra wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 09:35 AM, Arkady English wrote:
>> I create a number of copies of the following promise equal to one less
>> the number of First-Class players of Agora:
>>
>> Conditions: The casher, on cashing this promise, creates a promise
>> text: { If I ha
On 08/09/2011 09:35 AM, Arkady English wrote:
> I create a number of copies of the following promise equal to one less
> the number of First-Class players of Agora:
>
> Conditions: The casher, on cashing this promise, creates a promise
> text: { If I have supported or objected to an action, I retr
20 matches
Mail list logo
