On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> The infraction stuff is at...
>
> Ah, that's right. I have to admit I'm not crazy about the rest terminology
> at all; probably because I never liked notes and would prefer something
> independent for the day notes go away. If you're not proposing this
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008, Alexander Smith wrote:
> The contract reforms are at...
Thanks, I can see some good places to combine ideas. In particular, I
have no problem personally weakening equity even more than you did (there's
a better way to run contests than equity, partnerships shouldn't be equit
Goethe wrote:
> Can you point me to latest drafts of infraction reforms and also your
> contract reforms (hierarchy of types of enforceable contracts IIRC)?
> Happy to take a round as a coauthor for next drafts but I wasn't
> following earlier discussions fully...
The contract reforms are at
<
3 matches
Mail list logo
