On Monday 06 August 2007, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I assumed this was an equivocation on the meaning of "regularity",
> asserting that your messages to the public forums as a Player were not
> made with great frequency, having a space of years in between them.
>
> Either way, 754 doesn't require you
On 8/6/07, Peekee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Charge: violating Rule 754 by sending communication with little regularity
> >
> > Initiator: comex
>
> Firstly I am not sure what aspect of my message is offending here. I
> first thought is was because the message was
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Peekee wrote:
I am left wondering what part of Rule 754 I "violated":
FWIW, the way I read rule 754 it doesn't impose any obligations on anyone,
and so is incapable of being violated.
-zefram
Thanks thats a bit more brief than my version.
--
Peekee
Peekee wrote:
>I am left wondering what part of Rule 754 I "violated":
FWIW, the way I read rule 754 it doesn't impose any obligations on anyone,
and so is incapable of being violated.
-zefram
Quoting Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
H. Peekee, you are hereby informed that criminal cases 1715-1716 have
been initiated in which you are the defendant, and invited to rebut
the arguments for your guilt. The pre-trial phases end one week from
this message.
== CF
5 matches
Mail list logo
