Re: DIS: Proto-proposal: Rests, mark 2

2008-09-28 Thread ais523
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 14:16 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: > ais523 wrote: > > > Owning any positive number of Rests is a Losing Condition. A person who > > owns no rests is called "musical". > > "A person is musical if and only if e owns no rests. Failing to be > musical is a Losing Condition." Simil

Re: DIS: Proto-proposal: Rests, mark 2

2008-09-28 Thread Ed Murphy
ais523 wrote: > Owning any positive number of Rests is a Losing Condition. A person who > owns no rests is called "musical". "A person is musical if and only if e owns no rests. Failing to be musical is a Losing Condition." Similarly for flat, out-of-tune, etc.. > While a person owns at least

DIS: Proto-proposal: Rests, mark 2

2008-09-28 Thread ais523
Again, this is just a proto, not a proposal of any sort. Differences from the previous version are marked with comments after them. In a reverse of normal email conventions, the comments are marked with a leading > character on each line. Proposal: Rests (AI=2, II=1) Create a power-2 rule cal