root wrote:
Of course, letting it occur platonically can lead to cascading
reporting errors, but then that's why VCs are self-ratifying.
Yes, and that's been working _so well_, too.
Eris wrote:
On 12/1/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Proto-Proposal: Mark decay
(AI = 2, please)
Amend the rule "Marks" by appending this text to the list of ways
to gain and lose Marks:
(-*) Two seconds before the end of each month, each entity loses
eir holdings
On Dec 1, 2007 2:37 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then use ms :D
Why? We only have second precision on our timestamps.
-root
On Dec 1, 2007 2:32 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yuck. Can we just specify these ordering things directly and have them
> all happen by announcement?
I dislike things that need to occur regularly by announcement. For
example, the Speaker never did assign prerogatives for November.
Of c
On Saturday 01 December 2007, Ian Kelly wrote:
> What's so bad about 2 seconds before? It's unambiguous and trivial to
> calculate, and if we instead just have a bunch of stuff that happens
> "at the end of each month", then there are potential ordering
> conflicts.
Then use ms :D
signature.asc
On Dec 1, 2007 2:29 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend to vote against any proposal that uses "x seconds before/after" in
> a non-temporary rule, favoring (in this case) a proposal that also removes
> that notation from the VC (-*).
What's so bad about 2 seconds before? It's unambigu
On 12/1/07, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The two seconds is so that, one second after marks are converted to VCs, the
> VC decay takes effect.
>
> (Mark decay happens 2 seconds before, VC decay happens 1 second before)
Yuck. Can we just specify these ordering things directly and h
On Saturday 01 December 2007, Taral wrote:
> >(-*) Two seconds before the end of each month, each entity
> > loses eir holdings of each color of Mark, rounded down to the nearest
> > multiple of 100; for each 100 Marks of a given color that e loses, e
> > gains 1 VC of that color.
>
> What
On Saturday 01 December 2007 14:25:36 Taral wrote:
> On 12/1/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Proto-Proposal: Mark decay
> > (AI = 2, please)
> >
> > Amend the rule "Marks" by appending this text to the list of ways
> > to gain and lose Marks:
> >
> >(-*) Two seconds before the
On 12/1/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proto-Proposal: Mark decay
> (AI = 2, please)
>
> Amend the rule "Marks" by appending this text to the list of ways
> to gain and lose Marks:
>
>(-*) Two seconds before the end of each month, each entity loses
> eir holdings of
Proto-Proposal: Mark decay
(AI = 2, please)
Amend the rule "Marks" by appending this text to the list of ways
to gain and lose Marks:
(-*) Two seconds before the end of each month, each entity loses
eir holdings of each color of Mark, rounded down to the
nearest mult
11 matches
Mail list logo
